Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) introduced new legislation in Congress last week that would broaden the FDA’s inspection and enforcement authority with respect to foreign drugs and medical devices. To view the press release on the proposed legislation, click here.

This legislation, referred to as “The Drug and Device Accountability Act of 2009,” would give the FDA money to conduct foreign drug plant inspections. As stated by Sen. Grassley, “An increasing number of drugs and ingredients for pharmaceuticals are being manufactured in other countries, yet studies show the FDA doesn’t know how many foreign plants are subject to inspection, and the FDA conducts relatively few foreign inspections each year. Our legislation is a practical solution to beefing up the FDA’s inspection work, both domestically and abroad, and holding the FDA accountable for its review of medical devices, where questions have been raised about the agency’s work.”

The proposed legislation would also give the FDA the power to detain products from foreign plants when inspectors believe that a drug, (such as the dirty Chinese heparin that recently killed hundreds of Americans), has been adulterated. This is important because the FDA currently has no alternative, but to rely on the overworked and unfunded U.S. Customs to handle the actual seizure of suspect imported goods.

The bill would also give the FDA the power to issue subpoenas allowing the agency to obtain internal business records from careless drug manufacturers who ship production of their drugs overseas in order to increase corporate profit and avoid regulation meant to protect the American public. As discussed previously in our May 21, 2008 blog, “FDA Needs Subpoena Power,” without this ability, the agency is powerless to obtain internal business records from a negligent company who has allowed contaminated drugs to be sold, (such as Baxter who sold the dirty Chinese heparin from a foreign plant that Baxter knew had never been inspected by the FDA or any other governmental agency).

The FDA is one of the few Federal agencies that currently lacks subpoena power. As previously noted by Rep. Bart Stupak, (Chairman of the investigations panel of the House Commerce Committee), in a letter last year to the former FDA Chief, “An integral part of ensuring the FDA can protect the American people is equipping the Agency with proper resources and enforcement authority it currently lacks….In some cases, the FDA does no testing of its own, and in making decisions it must rely entirely on the test results submitted by manufacturers. Without subpoena power, the only way the FDA can ensure it has the information it needs it to threaten criminal prosecution by the Justice Department if it finds critical data is withheld.”

Finally, the proposed legislation would also require certification of applications for drugs and devices needing FDA approval and establish civil and criminal penalties for false or misleading certifications.

To fund the new powers, the bill would levy fees on plant inspections, thus putting the cost on the drug manufacturers who decide to send production overseas.

This regulation would likely have prevented the Heparin debacle and saved the lives of hundreds of innocent Americans. As such, we commend and support this important legislation.

At the April 29, 2008 hearing entitled, “The Heparin Disaster: Chinese Counterfeits and American Failures,” Rep. Bart Stupak, Chairman of the investigations panel of the House Commerce Committee, asked FDA representatives if the FDA needs subpoena authority. This subpoena power would give the FDA the power to demand certain documents from companies who have sold contaminated drugs, such as Baxter and SPL. Without this ability, the agency is powerless to obtain internal company documents that a company itself chooses to withhold. Dr. Janet Woodcock, Director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and Deborah Autor, Director of the FDA’s Office of Compliance, replied that this power “would be very helpful.”


Last week, Stupak followed up on his inquiry, sending a letter to the FDA Chief, Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D. This letter emphasized the importance of giving the FDA subpoena power and asked the FDA Chief to stand by the statement of Dr. Woodcock and Ms. Autor. (Wall Street Journal, 5/20/08, “Rep. Stupak Nudges FDA Toward Subpoena Power.”)


As noted by Stupak, the FDA is one of the few Federal agencies that lack subpoena power. In his letter, Stupak writes, “An integral part of ensuring the FDA can protect the American people is equipping the Agency with proper resources and enforcement authority it currently lacks….In some cases, the FDA does no testing of its own, and in making decisions it must rely entirely on the test results submitted by manufacturers. Without subpoena power, the only way the FDA can ensure it has the information it needs it to threaten criminal prosecution by the Justice Department if it finds critical data is withheld.”


After six years of debate whether Congress should give the FDA subpoena power, the most recent heparin disaster and the FDA’s inability to fully investigate what went wrong, should signal the importance and need to immediately provide this power. Stupak is correct. Without the ability to obtain all documents necessary for a full and fair investigation, we will likely never know the full truth as to how fake heparin was allowed to be sold and injected into hundreds of Americans. More importantly, we cannot ensure that it will not happen again.


-Submitted by Pamela A. Borgess