The Washington Post reported today that former officials, members of Congress, watchdog groups and various government reports are calling for an overhaul of the FDA, which “desperately needs an infusion of strong leadership, money, technology and personnel -- and perhaps a major restructuring.” (11/26/08 Washington Post, “Ailing FDA May Need a Major Overhaul, Officials and Groups Say.”)

The article is worth the read and discusses some of the FDA’s recent failures to monitor imported drugs and consumer products, including contaminated heparin, toothpaste, and pet food from China. As similarly opined in this blog recently, the article also discusses the view that more needs to be done than simply starting to open offices overseas, including sharply boosting inspections abroad, developing strict new regulatory standards, and updating and integrating the FDA's computer systems. To read a copy of this article, click here.

Labels: Baxter, Baxter Heparin, China, Chinese, FDA, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, SPL

Today, scientists at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill announced that they have discovered how to customize a key human enzyme responsible for producing heparin. (See NewsWise, “Scientists Teach Enzyme to Make Synthetic Heparin in More Varieties.") This important announcement brings researchers closer to developing a more effective synthetic anticoagulant, rather than using raw natural heparin from pigs. As a result, it would shorten the drug chain and make it less susceptible to contamination. This is important because as learned from the heparin debacle, companies such as Baxter and Scientific Protein Laboratories, who are more interested in saving a buck by purchasing product from China rather than protecting the American public, cannot be trusted to ensure the safety of their drug. As stated by Jian Liu, Ph.D., associate professor in the school’s medicinal chemistry and natural products division, “The pig stuff has served us well for 50 years and is very inexpensive, but if we cannot control the supply chain, we cannot ensure the safety of the drug.”

Labels: Baxter, Baxter Heparin, China, contamination, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, Liu, OSCS, Scientific Protein, synthetic heparin

Labels: Baxter, Baxter Heparin, China, Chinese, contamination, FDA, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, Hubley, nightline, OSCS, SPL

In response to the ongoing public outcry for protection from imported drugs and other products, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is finally taking some action. This week, the FDA is opening three offices in China. (11/17/08, Washington Post, “FDA to open China Offices After Product Scares.”) The first office will be opened in Beijing on Wednesday, followed by one in Guangzhou and another in Shanghai. According to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Mike Leavitt,13 employees will be assigned to work in the FDA offices in China, but he has not said what their role will be.

While this is certainly a good first step, it is only a baby-step. There are thousands of foreign companies who ship drugs into the United States, let alone other consumer products. Thus, additional presence and regulation is needed. Last year the FDA reported that it only had resources to inspect foreign pharmaceutical companies every 13 years. (U.S. Government Accountability Office, Drug Safety: Preliminary Findings Suggest Weakness in FDA’s Program for Inspecting Foreign Drug Manufacturer. Statement of Marcia Crosse, Director of Health Care, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, November 1, 2007.) It is unclear how much of an impact that three offices with only 13 employees, who must deal with multiple consumer products, (not just pharmaceuticals), will have on the undisputed inability of the FDA to ensure product safety of foreign products.

As often discussed on this blog, this inability to protect the American public underscores why preemption of lawsuits is wrong. Drug and medical device companies argue that Americans injured by defective drugs or medical devices should be barred from bringing suit, because the FDA can adequately protect the American public. The heparin disaster has made it clear that this assumption is inherently flawed.

Indeed, as also reported in this week's news, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a report showing "that historically the Food and Drug Administration has not sought to preempt state law claims, and that the agency 'viewed lawsuits brought by persons injured by a drug as a valuable complement to the agency's regulatory efforts.'" (11/17/08 Lawyers USA, "Report: FDA Staff Objected to Preemption Policies.") However, during the Bush administration the FDA made a dramatic reversal, adding preemption language to drug regulations. This language has now become "a cornerstone of drug industry preemption arguments."

According to the report, "key career officials" objected to the regulatory changes. The officials "repeatedly warned that the central factual justifications for the agency's new positions were false."

The American Association for Justice ("AAJ") "blasted the FDA over the report, noting that the findings were similar to those in an AAJ report released earlier this month." Geri Voss, Director of Regulatory Affairs at AAJ, said, "In a gift to big negligent corporations, the Bush Administration overrode the advice of career professionals, ignored the agency's history of respect for litigation and put consumer safety on the backburner." For a full copy of “Get Out of Jail Free: A Historical Perspective of How the Bush Administration Helps Corporations Escape Accountability” go to: www.justice.org/getoutofjailfree.

Labels: AAJ, Baxter, Baxter Heparin, China, FDA, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, imported drugs

Labels: Baxter, Baxter Heparin, China, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, Hubley, Johanna Staples, Leroy Hubley, OSCS, Time

Yesterday, the FDA seized 11 lots of Heparin products, valued at approximately $112,000, which were found to be contaminated with over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) from Celsus Laboratories in Cincinnati, Ohio. All 11 lots were manufactured with material imported from China, although the FDA reported that the contaminated crude heparin entered the United States prior to the import ban in April 2008. The discovery was found as part of the cooperative efforts by manufactures and the FDA to perform additional testing on all heparin materials to ensure no OCSC contamination. In fact, Celsus informed CNN that these lots had been quarantined by Celsus since March 8, 2008.

The FDA previously reported recalls of heparin products from Celsus Laboratories because of finding that batches of crude heparin Celsus received from their supplier contained OCSC. Celsus was also reprimanded by the FDA earlier this year for insufficient efforts by Celsus to notify its customers about the contaminated heparin products.

Celsus is a private business that has been manufacturing heparin related products, among others, since 1987. It not only provides its products here in the U.S., but also exports to many other countries, such as Australia, Canada, the European Union, and Japan.

Correction to reflect updated information:

USA Today originally reported that the contaminated heparin was imported from Changzhou SPL, the Chinese arm of U.S. based Scientific Protein Labs. USA Today cited FDA Spokeswoman Karen Riley for that information. They have now corrected their story to eliminate SPL as the source of the contaminated heparin after I brought this claim to the attention of the SPL attorney. Celsus had never been listed before as a customer of SPL or CZSPL. It is not clear whether the FDA spokesperson was misunderstood by USA Today, or if the FDA spokesperson was simply wrong as to the source of the contaminated product. Certainly the FDA should clarify this and should announce, publicly, the source of the OSCS contaminated heparin utilized by Celsus.

The FDA says it inspected Celsus Laboratories in April and found that two of its heparin products were contaminated.

The company had sent a letter to its customers telling them its heparin was contaminated, but FDA wanted the company to physically recall the product because of the danger it presented to patients.

FDA sent a follow-up letter to the company again asking for a recall on May 8.

What the federal marshals did Thursday was to seize the contaminated heparin that remained at the company's facilities, Riley says.

Comment: There is nothing in this latest story to establish that importations of contaminated heparin have occurred since April of 2008. But the story does show a conscious disregard by Celsus for the health and safety of the consumer. The FDA should have more power so that they can enforce the recall of these products.

In my opinion the FDA should also focus on inspection of existing health care facilities in this country to insure that all the bad stuff is off the shelf. I am personally more concerned about seizure of existing product in the hands of health care providers than raids to recover product that has already been quarantined.

And I want to know if Celsus used any of the contaminated Heparin in any of the products it shipped since April.

It is going to take much more than this raid to convince Americans that the FDA is doing its job; however the fact that Celsus chose to ignore the FDA request for a recall shows that Celsus has failed to act responsibly and has instead shown callous disregard for the consumer.

UPDATE COMMENT: Celsus should immediately disclose the source of the contaminant. Was Celsus experimenting with the use of OSCS? Did it know the products it sold contained OSCS? Celsus, up to now, has had a very good reputation. Its web site, www.heparin.com states:

Celsus is pursuing the development of a proprietary complex carbohydrate comprising a rare disaccharide sequence that may be prepared by chemical synthesis, genetically modified organism or site selected 6-O-sulfation of dermatan sulfate for medical needs unmet by heparin or its low molecular weight derivatives.

Celsus owes the world an explanation.

Labels: Baxter Heparin, Celsus, FDA, OSCS, over sulfated chondroitin sulfate

On October 23, 2008, The Institute for Safe Medication Practice, (a nonprofit group that educates the healthcare community about safe medication practices), issued a report on the number of serious injuries and death reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the first quarter of 2008. (See Inst. For Safe Med. Practices: 10/23/08, “Quarter Watch: 2008 Q 1.”)

According to this report, the number of reports of serious injuries and death linked to medications hit a record high. In the first three months of 2008, there were 20,745 new cases of serious injury and 4,824 reports of death. This total was 38% higher than the average for the previous four quarters, and the highest for any quarter. Death cases also accounted for a larger share with 23% for the first quarter of 2008 as compared to a historical average of 16%. This represented a 2.6 fold increase from the previous quarter and the highest number of deaths in a calendar quarter since 2004.

Two drugs accounted for a disproportionate share, including Chantix, a new anti-smoking drug from Pfizer, Inc. (with 1001 cases of serious injury and 50 deaths), and Heparin imported from China, (with 779 cases of serious injury and 102 deaths). (The FDA has actually reported receiving 238 reports of death from contaminated heparin over a longer period, but 102 represent the first quarter.)

Even scarier for the American public is the fact that because reporting is voluntary, these reports represent “only a small fraction of the adverse drug events that occur.” Id. at 1.

As concluded by the Institute, “While prescription drugs bring great benefits to millions of patients and most are used safely, these data show the need for additional progress to better manage the risks to patients….It also underlines the importance of the nation’s system for assuring drug product stability and purity. The scale of injury--hundreds of deaths or serious injuries in a short period—underlines the importance of strengthening oversight of drug manufacture abroad.” Id. at 4.

Labels: Baxter, Baxter Heparin, Chantix, China, contamination, Heparin, heparin attorney, Heparin Class Action, heparin lawsuit, heparin lawyer, Institute for Safe Medication Practice, SPL